Wednesday, 28 September 2022

Still blaming each other


As it is known, the two gas pipelines through the Baltic sea, which were recently damaged, don't belong entirely to a Russian company or Russia's government. European companies and Russian company Gazprom invested Billions of dollars to set up the infrastructure that probably faced sabotage attack. And according to seismologists, the two pipelines were hit by strong underwater explosions.
Although the USA have always been a strong opponent of EU's energy dependance on Russian company Gazprom, it isn't easy to understand who planned the attack

27 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. I do hope we will get evidence about the author of such military operation.

      Delete
  2. Giorgio I’m sending you the latest news from Poland, what a politician from the Polish opposition wrote on Twitter (he’s in the European Parliament now and he was in the past (!!!) foreign minister!!!). How could this idiot be the head of diplomacy!!!?!?!?!?!!!!!!
    His tweet about the current situation and Nord Stream - Giorgio I say: if something bad is done by Russia to Europe, thanks should be sent to Radoslaw Sikorski!!!! After his words Russia may accuse NATO of terrorism.
    https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/zagranica/news-rosjanie-wykorzystuja-wpis-sikorskiego-zacharowa-czy-to-ofic,nId,6312230#comments4-1
    Russia is already asking: "Is this an official statement about a terrorist attack?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I don't think so! It isn't a terrorist attack. It's a coordinated military action of a state.
      Sorry to see military operations are spreading across the Baltic area!
      Thank you for the link!

      Delete
  3. Money is tied up in politics too. Money trail takes precedence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Radosław Sikorski, Poland's former foreign minister, thanked the USA for damaging the turbines.

    Why don't you believe him? He told the truth and then got scared and deleted his tweet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've just got this info which has been published by Shamar Levinloy:

      ""As an American citizen, I will confirm this to be true. A US naval ship USS Kearsarge was present in the Baltic Sea 30-50 kilometers near the pipelines and American intelligence warned Germany before it occurred. I believe it was the U.S.""

      Delete
    2. I know that there were American ships and American planes flying in this place. This is proof that the Americans ruined two turbines.

      Americans have always dreamed of selling gas to Europe. Europe did not need cheap Russian gas. Now buy gas from the US. The US will be happy to destroy the EU economy.

      Delete
  5. These are Russian gas pipelines. These gas pipelines are the property of Russia. We have been building them for a long time. We spent 17 billion dollars. My country has lost a large number of cubic meters of gas, and therefore $2 billion in addition to the $300 billion that the European Union and NATO stole from us by blocking our bank accounts.

    What right did the Americans have to blow up our turbines?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've got evidence that Germany is in control of the Project.

      Anyway, with regard to the sabotage on the underwater infrastructure, another important info is the following:

      On February 7, the USA President, Joe Biden said: "If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2."
      The US president also said: "We will bring an end to it".
      A journalist asked Biden how he could do that since Germany was in control of the project, the president replied: "I promise you: we will be able to do it."
      The video is on Newsweek, 9-28-2022 @7:41 EDT

      Delete
    2. Germany received Russian gas through the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, and then Germany turned off this turbine.
      Now Germany will never have Russian gas. Yes, Germany was in charge of the Project, but the turbines were Russian, and both gas pipelines belong to Russia. And this is our Russian gas.
      Why would we blow up both of our gas pipelines? We could just turn them off in Moscow. But they were turned off by Germany under pressure from the United States. How are we going to fix it now?

      I heard Biden say on February 7th when he said he would end Nord Stream 2. Now Donald Trump is also saying that it is the United States that damaged both gas pipeline turbines.

      Delete
    3. Russia's gas company, Gazprom, owns 51% of the Nord Stream pipelines, with EU countries holding the remaining 49%.

      Delete
    4. Consequently, considering that Gazprom owns 51% of the Nord Stream pipelines, with EU countries holding the remaining 49%, we can easily make the first step of the investigation, which means that Russia & EU countries weren't interested in destroying their own underwater infrastructure.

      Meanwhile, the EU currency continues to fall to lowest in 20 years, hitting parity with USA dollar ... I think some countries are so glad to see the EU countries to their knees. And those countries are winning the war at the moment.

      Delete
  6. Some countries built these pipelines from Russia to Germany. Germany was the head of the project. But the turbines are Russian and the gas is from Russia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The gas is from Russia. That's known!

      Delete
    2. I agree with you. Do you read the blog of Gus (Il blog di Gus)? Can you read his post of 30th September? I'd like to know your opinion.

      Delete
    3. https://www.gus.ca/en/blog/ ... are you talking about this one?

      Otherwise, could you send me its link through email? This is my email address:
      giorgio.russo3@virgilio.it

      Thank you, Irina :-)

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. True, my friend! I'm afraid this war continues to spread across Europe, as the gas pipelines' attack has already brought the war from Ukraine to the Baltic sea. Unfortunately, hitting underwater infrastructures may become a new way of fighting a war. And in this dirty perspective, the problem is that there're many underwater infrastructures across the world, such as undersea fiber optic cables and underwater potable water pipes, which could by hit by both belligerents and countries that don't promote peace and are interested in the benefit of war.

      Thank you for sharing your point of view :-)

      Delete
  8. Siempre habrá intereses ocultos Te mando un beso.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! Now we can understand who was involved in such attack.

      Delete
  9. It seems there same evidence now ... as forecasted, the author of the pipelines' attack is a power strongly interested in a neverending war in East Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I' m not the owner of the truth but I don't understand why Russia might be the guilty of the attack. There is no clear evidence to condemn USA but I think that we can have just a little doubt. The reason might be that as I wrote in Gus blog, Europe could be the real goal of USA and Russia. Everybody can understand that the field of a possible war would be Europe. Sometimes I think that it is a rigged match and that USA and Russia have the secret goal to divide Europe in two blocks again, as it was before 1989. I hope my English is not too bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Daniele,
      your English is okay :-)
      Actually, as you mentioned, East Europe could be the battlefield between the two superpowers. Unfortunately, we can see that the war in East Europe has already spread from Ukraine to the Baltic area.
      As it is known, the next one will be Georgia, where in some areas there is a small Russian population, and the most popular TV channels in those areas are Russian. In addition there are also problems with regards to Moldova and Finland, due to the fact that the latter has had open and regular political dialogue with NATO.
      In 1942 Nicholas J. Spykman, a Dutch-American geostrategist, argued that a United Europe will be disadvantageous under any circumstances. He preferred a fragmentation of power among states within Europe as more advantageous to American interests.

      Thank you for sharing your point of view :-)

      Delete